Awarding Soeharto the Title of National Hero Draws Appreciation from Various Groups
Jakarta – The awarding of the title of National Hero to the second President of the Republic of Indonesia, Soeharto, has received widespread appreciation from various groups. Religious figures, public officials, and academics believe that Soeharto deserves state recognition for his services and dedication to maintaining stability and building the nation.
Asrorun Niam Sholeh, Head of the Indonesian Ulema Council (MUI) Fatwa Division, stated that a great nation is one that respects its leaders.
“Every former president who has passed away deserves to be named a national hero. They have struggled and sacrificed while leading the country,” he said.
He emphasized that the award is not merely symbolic, but also serves as a momentum to strengthen national values and unity.
Asrorun Niam also believes that awarding Soeharto the title is a wise step in strengthening the spirit of national reconciliation.
“People should not harbor grudges and bring up past mistakes, because no one is perfect,” he said.
He added that every leader works in their own time, with their own challenges and limitations.
“We cannot continue to judge the past through the lens of the present. Forgiving and appreciating the nation’s services are signs of national maturity,” he added.
Minister of Culture, Fadli Zon, shared a similar view. He emphasized that there was no evidence to suggest Suharto was involved in the 1965–1966 genocide.
“These accusations have never been proven legally or through valid historical facts,” he said.
According to him, assessments of national figures must be based on objective data, not political stigma or particular interests.
Suharto is known for leading Indonesia for 32 years with various development programs, such as the Repelita (Five-Year Development Plan) and the GBHN (National Guidelines for Development), which became the foundation of national progress.
Although the New Order era was not without criticism, many believe that his contributions must be viewed comprehensively and proportionally.
Support also came from the Chairman of Muhammadiyah, Dadang Kahmad, who considered Suharto an important figure in the nation’s history.
“We must assess history proportionally. Suharto rendered great service to Indonesia, both as a freedom fighter and as a development leader,” he said, recalling Suharto’s role in the General Offensive of March 1, 1949.
The awarding of the title of National Hero to Suharto is seen as a form of respect for his dedication and a symbol of the nation’s maturity in appreciating its historical journey. ***





